
― “Discretion at the Frontlines”: How Responsibility Takes Shape ―
■ Responsibility Doesn’t Grow from the Top Alone
When we think of a company’s sense of responsibility, we often imagine the attitude of the CEO or company-wide policies. However, the impression left on customers is most influenced by the frontline staff who interact directly with them. No matter how impressive a company’s philosophy may be, if customers experience cold or unhelpful responses at stores or call centers, their trust in the brand can quickly erode. This is why the level of “discretion” given to the staff on the ground is a critical factor in turning responsibility into action.■ “Discretion as a Form of Responsibility” in Japanese Companies
In Japanese service industries, actions that go beyond the manual are often praised. For example:- A cashier leaves their lane to personally guide a confused customer.
- A call center operator handles an issue outside their jurisdiction, saying, “We don’t want to inconvenience you further.”
■ “Consistency and Fairness” in Western Companies
In contrast, Western companies tend to prioritize consistent service delivery over individual discretion. If staff decisions vary based on personal judgment, it may be perceived as “unfair” by customers. For example:- A customer might complain, “The last representative allowed it, but this time I was refused.”
■ Responsibility: Individual Optimization vs. Overall Optimization
What emerges here is that the cultural approach to responsibility differs:- In Japan, responsibility emphasizes doing the best for the individual customer in front of you.
- In Western cultures, responsibility prioritizes fair and consistent service for all customers.
- Japanese companies highlight attention to detail and care for each customer.
- Western companies emphasize transparency, clear rules, and equal experiences.
■ Discretion Shapes the Brand Experience
Ultimately, deciding how much discretion to give frontline staff is about how a company wishes to demonstrate its sense of responsibility.- Too much discretion: Risk of inconsistent decisions, which can harm brand consistency.
- Too little discretion: Risk of appearing rigid or unfeeling.